Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    12 years ago

    There where Times when Ubuntu was Marks baby, but nowadays with pro, advertisement and tracking in the terminal an AppStore, everything has to have a businesscase.

    I would recommend just plain Debian either with flatpak or in the testing branch. It’s almost the same, stable as a rock and driven by a community.

    • ☂️-
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.

            If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)

            • ☂️-
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                On my side it’s running since years without problems. I would never use arch on a business workstation with debian testing I see no problems at all.