How does it stack up against traditional package management and others like AUR and Nix?

  • haui
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    As a generalist I have to learn many concepts and dont have time to delve into any one that deep. Flatpak works and isnt proprietary like snap so I enjoy that. My recent debian+kde installation works well with if. Open discover and install flatpaks as much as you wish.

        • kingmongoose7877
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          The Snap Store is run and controlled by Canonical and is not open source. The rest of Snap is open source, meaning the daemon and core software. [emphasis mine] How threatening this is depends on you POV and has been the subject of much discussion.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            if the only way to use the open source client, is with a closed source server, is it really open source at all? The platform is the server.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            41 year ago

            This isn’t threatening in a way that Canonical would hack my computer with it. It’s threatening the Linux ecosystem. They created a distro agnostic package manager which is solely controlled by them. In other words they want everyone to use Snap and then vendor lock in everyone into it. “embrace, extend, extinguish”

            I honestly wouldn’t care if snap was both Canonical proprietary and Ubuntu proprietary but this M$ like strategy sucks.