LOL

    • just another devA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31
      edit-2
      25 days ago

      Yes it is. Although I personally have far less moral objections to it.

      To elaborate:
      OpenAI scraped data without permission, and then makes money from it.

      Deepseek then used that data (even paid openai for it), trained a model on that data, and then releases that model for anyone to use.

      While it’s still making use of “stolen data” (that’s a whole semantics discussion I won’t get into right now), I find it far more noble than the former.

        • just another devA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          125 days ago

          And then handed it out for free, yes. Although I’m sure they’re making money out of it as well - obviously they’re not saints.

    • @harsh3466@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1125 days ago

      Came to say something similar. Like I give a fuck that OpenAI’s model/tech/whatever was “stolen” by Deepseek. Fuck that piece of shit Sam Altman.

    • @wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      525 days ago

      “Recieving stolen goods” is prosecutable.

      It’s a lesser crime than the original theft though.