• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Holy shit.

    I thought this was just going to be a matter of poor security implementation or crappy feature sets.

    Turns out they converted the company into a loan shark operation owned by Chinese ad companies

    when the Opera browser continued losing users (due to competition from Google and Apple), the company shifted gears to building mobile apps that provided predatory short-term loans. The interest rates on those loans ranged from 365-876% per year, and loan terms from 7-29 days.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1631 year ago

      This behavior is just beyond batshit. Before anyone decides tl;dr, the article is well worth a read.

      I had a hunch that Opera was circling the drain when I started seeing them sponsor Youtubers. A general rule of thumb is that no company that has anything worth a shit devolves to sponsoring Youtube videos. I had no idea about the predatory loans thing, or the crypto scam chasing thing, or the ripping off ChatGPT thing…

      Back here in reality, there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox. There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        791 year ago

        And it’s always been Firefox since day one. Out of the ashes of Netscape Navigator rose Firefox and Mozilla have been one of the only bastions of the free and open web ever since. I honestly don’t understand why anyone would use another browser.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Actually it’s an effective cloud-based password manager that doesn’t rely on local storage or weird plugins or backups.

            That’s what keeps me using chrome. I could lose everything in a house fire, pick up any device, log in and have access to all my stuff without any further action on my part, right out of the box.

            That’s the only feature I care about, and chrome is the only browser I’ve seen that provides it.

            Get me that in firefox, and I’ll switch today.

            • 📛Maven
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              What are you talking about? Firefox has had literally Sync since before Chrome existed.

              Firefox Sync initial release: December 21, 2007

              Google Chrome intial release: September 2, 2008 (Beta), (1.0) December 11, 2008

              A full year, my guy.

            • Deebster
              link
              fedilink
              English
              42
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I’m confused since Firefox Sync has been letting you sync/backup your passwords, bookmarks and history for a decade or two at this point, and you can even self-host the sync server.

              I don’t know the complete FF password manager details (Bitwarden user here) but where does Firefox fall short for you?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              291 year ago

              You can lose your Google account in the blink of an eye with no recourse, no access to support or anything.

              With local and my own backups, I can choose to put them at any location, cloud or local.

            • Swaziboy
              link
              fedilink
              English
              241 year ago

              I have all that functionality today with FF… Not sure when you last checked, but if you create a Mozilla account and log in to FF you can sync all the same stuff as Chrome does.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                Checked it out: apparently I had a mozilla account at one point in time. Hit ‘forgot password’:

                Note: When you reset your password, you reset your account. You may lose some of your personal information (including history, bookmarks, and passwords). That’s because we encrypt your data with your password to protect your privacy.

                Forgot your password: fuck you.

                This is the exact fucking opposite of the behaviour I’d ever want from a password manager.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  291 year ago

                  I think that’s what most people want in a password manager. The only way to have a truly secure pw manager is to encrypt it and failsafe to delete. That way if your identity gets stolen or email compromised, it limits the damage.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  51 year ago

                  Forgot your password: fuck you.

                  This is the exact fucking opposite of the behaviour I’d ever want from a password manager.

                  Wait wait wait wait, you’re telling me you want the people who hold your password to be able to view them without your explicit permission (entering a secret that unlocks your vault)? Because that’s what you’re asking for - if they can reset your password and provide you your plaintext passwords, that means they can 1) read your passwords if they chose to and 2) you can be phished and have your account stolen and passwords provided to some rando.

                  The convenience offered by that “feature” is outweighed by the potential consequences of it existing. Passwords should absolutely be a Trust No One (TNO) solution.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 year ago

              That’s great until Google finds that one picture of your child at the pool and immediately deletes your CSAM-harboring filthy account.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 year ago

          Sadly chromium is often the only supported browser for a lot of web apps. Sometimes not even chromium but just chrome in particular. Chrome has basically inherited all the downsides of internet explorer of yesteryear except it doesn’t run like shit yet.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            161 year ago

            I wonder if it’s really a lack of support and not just a user agent string check for lazy development.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              and google sabotaging shit so it only works on their platform.

              Like they did with youtube and Edge (before they finally gave in to googles terrorism and switched edge to chrome base)

              like they are doing with youtube and adblockers.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          I’ll say this. I use chrome and I KNOW I need to switch to Mozilla. It’s just such a pain to switch that I inevitably go back. Maybe this is the wake up call I need.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Cuz Firefox was for a long time just some shiiiiiiit. It was overloaded, blocky, seemed outdated etc., so ie wasn’t any worse. When chrome came, whooo.

          Now tho, I am simply still prejudiced against it. And I found Edge suits me ideally so I don’t care for any other browser. Until my adblock stops working, then I’ll run.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I also left Firefox for Chrome many years ago during that time period, but Firefox has been good again for quite some time. They did a big refresh called Quantum several years back and solved most of those issues. Give it a try.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              They also solved the “issue” of XULRunner and all associated functionality, not offering anything instead.

              I had to move from conkeror, and now jump between FF and SeaMonkey. The latter lags behind a bit in porting FF functionality.

              To each his own, I guess.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        201 year ago

        I do not agree with your generalisation of YouTube sponsorships, but with the rest I absolutely agree with.

        Honestly, I read something about Opera being vaguely connected to shady Chinese companies right before I started recommending ppl to switch away from Opera or Opera GX. Glad I stuck to that, looks like my intuition did not fail me.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          You, uh, really feel that the likes of Raid: Shadow Legends, Nord VPN, Honey by PayPal, Raycons, and HelloFresh are really making a positive contribution to the world that we can’t do without?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I mean, what’s the problem with NordVPN? Pretty much every youtuber I respect who does sponsorship promotes it, and I’ve never heard anything bad about it. Generalizing like that is always bad (or well, mostly always, or ironically I would be generalizing).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I think there might be a few exceptions, but generally it’s just loot boxes and predatory games.

      • Engywook
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        there is no reason anyone should be using any other browser than Firefox.

        Yeah. And everybody should use the same brand of shoes, drive the same model of car, buy at the same store, eat the same food…

        God forbids people having different tastes, opinions and needs.

        There is one organization left in this arena still devoted to protecting privacy, maintaining open standards, and a fair and open web for all. And it ain’t Google, it ain’t Microsoft, and it ain’t Opera.

        Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah, and it’s not Mozilla either.

          Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here. I don’t disagree with on most of what you said - I find the simping for Mozilla (and sneering towards chromium) here in Lemmy rather annoying. Mozilla and its browser both have shortcomings as well, and choosing a web browser these days is, as most things in life, choosing the lesser of evils vs. one’s own needs.

          • Engywook
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Which one do you think it is, then? Genuinely curious here.

            I simply don’t assume that an org/com actually exist which is concerned users’ privacy. Mozilla just follows the money, as any other corp.

            Protecting my privacy is a task I prefer to delegate to mybrain(.org).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        251 year ago

        Yeah, I was a huge fan but the moment they changed the engine it was just Chrome in different skin. And later the news that they were bought by a Chinese firm doing shady stuff just confirmed that it was the right decision.

        I am sad that they did not open source the engine. Somebody leaked it, but no one serious would touch it for legal reasons.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          For me old Opera is an artifact of the bygone era, together with old Skype and Hamachi, when some proprietary software would really work well and even support Linux.

          Opera actually even released FreeBSD versions, if I’m not mistaken.

          Skype - we all know what.

          Hamachi still works =)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yeah the surprise in this thread is surprising to me. I’ve considered Opera to be untrustworthy for years now.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1651 year ago

    I knew not to use Opera GX as soon as they started sponsoring youtubers. I swear, youtube sponsorships are like anti-ads. 9 times out of 10 they’re doing something sketchy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      721 year ago

      When I see a product I already use being promoted by YouTubers in sponsored segments, I immediately question if I should be using it, even if I’d have happily continued had I never seen that sponsorship.

      • Neshura
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 year ago

        Absolutely true. I remember every YouTuber and their mother shilling out for LastPass a few years back. Now that their reputstion is kind of in the dumps after several “noncritical” hacks I see those same YouTubers shilling out for Dashlane.

        It just gets worse if you try to think of any serious sponsorship program by companies that are, to date, trustworthy. There are none because they don’t need them. Word of mouth is good enough for them because the customers they have will stay being customers for a long time. Long enough that they bring in more people just by being happy about the service.

        • Funwayguy
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 year ago

          Same with Express/Nord VPN sponsorships. Many people debunked the adverising BS they were spinning about blocking tracking when really it only masked a tiny subset.

          As someone who studied infosec, those ads were infuriating. Now I just sponsor block it all because I’m beyond tired of it.

          • Neshura
            link
            fedilink
            English
            131 year ago

            Really like Mullvad for that. They don’t pretend a VPN alone makes you invisible for tracking nor do they pretend it makes your browsing much more secure. They don’t do any BS sales either. You get what you pay for and they are very upfront about what you get (mostly ISP block and region lock bypass).

            Haven’t seen a YT sponsorship for them yet either so that’s another plus in my book.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          8
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I left LastPass as soon as they started screwing with the free product. Same with Evernote. It’s fine to make a non-free product. But if you make a free product with premium settings you can’t go back and pinch the original user base by taking features away. Those companies *products always fail.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      Lol, now that I think of it I had never seen a YouTube ad or sponsor where I would say “this is an ethical and fairly priced product without a catch that I would like to buy”…

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I only saw a decent product once, it was Henson razor. Not sure if it’s ethical and fairly priced (those are somewhat hard to tell, imo). If I weren’t using it already, the sponsorship would have deterred from trying 😅

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      I swear, youtube sponsorships are like anti-ads. 9 times out of 10 they’re doing something sketchy.

      We’re the minority though.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Agreed. I think (and I’m not sponsored lol) that the only product from YouTube that’s actually good is Harry’s razors

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1421 year ago

    Opera invested $30 million in the crypto startup ICST that same year, and the startup’s CEO was arrested four days later for financial crimes.

    LOL

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    86
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Explain why don’t just clickbait me.

    Man its fucking sad what’s become of Opera. They gave us tabbed browsing, CSS, and lots of other stuff and then just like that, they became another uninteresting Chromium fork and its been straight to the shitter since.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      511 year ago

      Many of the O.G. Opera devs founded Vivaldi after Opera was sold to Chinese investors. It’s Chromium, but it has a considerable number of excellent power user features

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        191 year ago

        I believe they also have plans to move beyond Chromium, but a new code base isn’t a quick project… (That said, they do eliminate the tracking features and other questionable elements of the code currently.)

    • dantheclamman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 year ago

      Why is it clickbait? I don’t understand. The article explains the reasons. They don’t fit in the headline.

    • wagoner
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 year ago

      I had an @operamail email account for years, I was all in!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    631 year ago

    Hindenburg is an investment firm that researches publicly-traded companies and shorts their stocks if they find sufficient evidence of investor fraud before releasing its report.

    What a wild business plan. I’m amazed it’s legal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      It’s kinda scummy to manipulate the market as such, but it’s much more scummy to partake in the fraud.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Short sellers provide benefit to society by finding and shaming doomed businesses so they fail faster and don’t suck up as many resources.

      They also have a proud history of uncovering outright fraud.

      In business, the people complaining loudest about short sellers are emperors with no clothes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      Yeah, that was a depressing discovery. I didn’t see any news about it but one day randomly wondered how opera could afford to develop a free browser that wasn’t FOSS. Digging into it was surprising. Not quite John McAfee surprising, but still sketchy. Like they were in the predatory banking industry and then there were the ties to China. It wasn’t hard to see that it was time to check out Firefox again.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      I stopped using Opera when they dropped their actual product in favor of yet another Chromium-based something.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 year ago

    Opera was effectively the first software I bought, back when they had a trial version in 2001. They had tabbed browsing and mouse gestures, a solid DECADE before they came to any other browser. Lightyears ahead of the competition and worth every penny. I think in 2003 they made it free, and I wasn’t even mad.

    I was forced to switch to Firefox at some point when a website I had to use for work was incompatible due to some Java applet that wouldn’t load properly, and then slowly migrated over.

    Shame to see what happened to this amazing piece of tech.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      It’s really tough to run a business when your competitors are all free as in freedom (Firefox) or free as in funded by monopolistic megacorps (Google, Apple, Microsoft).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      131 year ago

      To be fair, Opera in the 2000’s was craming every single feature they could think about in their browser.

      So sure, they got some interesting features before the others but they also had hundreds of useless features cluttering the UI.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        But it was still fast and didn’t gobble up RAM so much (well other than memory leaks, but none of the competitors were free of those either and IE crashing would also crash the desktop because it was the same instance of the same app for some reason).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        You bought the ad-free version, they had a small banner on top. And of course there were key generators and such, back in the days there wasn’t any online key validation. Or you could kill the banner with a local proxy. Still, I actually wanted to support the development, just like I donate to good FOSS software now, or buy android apps to remove ads although I’m already killing them all with adaway on a rooted phone.

        Sure, there were free browsers out there, but back then Opera was really way ahead of the bell curve.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    441 year ago

    Vivaldi Browser is headed by some of the original founders of Opera ASA and is a reasonably good alternative to Google Chrome, MS Edge, Safari and new Opera itself.

    Alternatively, use Gecko-based browsers such as Firefox/Waterfox/Iceraven.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    311 year ago

    As somebody whose wife just downloaded opera onto the family computer I am horrified.

    She’s been complaining that the internet is slow and has blamed it on protonvon, so has resorted to turning the vpn off when using the internet or discord.

    I remember after Twin Peaks season 3 came out, showtime was stating left and right how profitable the show was, and then accusations started flying that the show was so profitable because showtime was taking over the browser while people were watching and mining bitcoin in the background without telling people they were doing so.

    I trust Opera about a thousand times less just because I had never hears of them until a week or two ago.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      261 year ago

      Opera has been in the web browser playing field for a long time at this point, but haven’t been super relevant until the last couple years due to GX

      • The Menemen!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        It was somewhat hyped to a degree in the mid 2000s. It had a lot of features other browsers hadn’t and many things just worked better, especially using tabs worked much better with them. They also had a linux version when that was not a common thing. Was kinda sad to see them fall.

        • megane-kun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          Yeah, I remember the IT department at work back then (circa 2006) recommending Opera to me. It had features that are more or less mainstream now, like tab reloading on a timer, and all that while running smoothly than any other browser I’ve used at that time.

          Since then, I’ve tried a lot of browsers like Vivaldi and Maxthon, but for some reason or the other, like being bloated, or being taken over by entities I don’t trust, had found a reason to move to a different browser. Currently using LibreWolf, and I hope I won’t have any reason to switch browsers anytime soon.

    • Elbrar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 year ago

      I used Opera way back in high school over 2 decades ago. The name has been around for a long time, but I don’t know how related the current company is to back then… The product certainly isn’t related anymore since it’s just another chromium clone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      I used Opera because you could place tabs at the bottom of the window. When Opera became just a Chrome skin, I switched to Firefox because through the Tab Mix Plus extension I could place the tabs to the bottom. When Firefox killed the extension (and many more), I switched to Vivaldi (made by the former Opera team) because it offered tabs on the bottom. Very recently I switched to Waterfox, because @[email protected] told me the browser also allows for tabs to be placed at the bottom. What can I say… I’m a bottom kind of guy…

      • Druid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        Any particular reason you want your tabs at the bottom of the window? Aesthetics, work flow, grouping?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          Just something I’m used to. I have windows tabs on the bottom, so I’d like to have everything in the same place, rather than move the cursor all over the screen. I guess it’s a holdover back from Netscape days when I had several separate windows open, and they all had their own tab on the Windows task bar.

      • Alex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Floorp also has that feature, and Vivaldi’s split tabs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        privacy hardened

        Can you elaborate? I looked at the page for LibreWolf and as best as I can tell they just change some default settings and add Ublock as a pre installed extension.

        • megane-kun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          I tried using hardened Firefox before moving on to use LibreWolf. Manually hardening Firefox is arguably more powerful than what you’d have with LibreWolf out of the box, but the effort involved in making those changes in the settings and remembering what they are (what they were by default, and what they were changed to) makes it hard to maintain.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            makes it hard to maintain.

            Do you mean across devices? I don’t think it changes the settings when it updates but i could be wrong.

            • megane-kun
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 year ago

              Back when I tried it, I only had it in one device–which is great, since I dunno if I can do it on more than one device, let alone worry how a hardened Firefox mobile would even look like.

              I actually don’t remember if the settings change with updates. But I suppose they don’t (as they don’t either with Librewolf). What I meant with “hard to maintain” is basically keeping note that the hardened Firefox config doesn’t behave like vanilla Firefox (and isn’t expected to). Making some temporary changes to accommodate a “necessary evil” website, you’d have to make note what setting you “temporarily” have to change it to, what the hardened config should be for that setting, and most importantly: remembering to change it back to the hardened config.

              So, I guess it’s not really a matter of maintaining the config than being aware of all those config changes (from default). With LibreWolf, I’m just brushing it off as “yeah, that’s how LibreWolf works.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They did some awesome browsers back in the early 2000s. I couldn’t think about browsing the web without Opera Mini back then.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      And despite being designed to run on potatoes with a 2G connection it somehow felt just as smooth as modern mobile browsers (at least as I remember it). It’s crazy how well it worked considering the hardware and network limitations of the time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        141 year ago

        Didn’t opera cache images on their server and feed you a lower res version instead of what the website had? Granted with the limited bandwidth available back then, that was fine but now I don’t think many people would want that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          121 year ago

          Exactly this. Lower resolution and added compression. You could click to view full version if needed, but this was a feature as it meant faster loading and a small fraction of the data usage.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          71 year ago

          In Opera Mini, yes. They also had a less popular but nearly identical browser, Opera Mobile, which didn’t do the proxying and compression. I had an unlimited data plan back then, so I always used Mobile. The performance was great even without compression.

      • kratoz29
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I remember an ex-girlfriend daily driving it on her phone for all kinds of communications, so maybe this is why she preferred it, I never wondered why, I was very happy with my Linux machine and I barely used my mobile phone at those times anyway.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Amazing piece of software. Reliable on the server side, agile and full of features on the mobile side. And they even made sure that sites like Twitter and Facebook could be used in the browser. What a pity the Opera branding ended like this.