The fediverse won’t succeed at putting up a #Stackoverflow substitute and that’s a problem?
Just an impression: All the pieces seem to be there. But what’s required is a team, with devs, PMs and coordinators, dedicated to making a particular place in the #fediverse .
That’s resources and decently sized financial and organisational demands, especially to get a critical mass of users.
Is the fediverse up to that challenge? If not, is it an issue worth addressing?
The power of SO was never the software. It was the relentless effort the team put into community building and making sure site was valuable both as an interactive experience and as an archive.
You can’t code yourself out of that effort.
Yea. That’s more or less what I had in mind. This isn’t merely a matter of writing the software. Like I said, many of the pieces are basically here already. It’s building the place/platform, which has to include a whole bunch of just “work” including the moderation that you mention.
Additionally: adoption is a feature you can’t design. Any site that’s just people talking is either firmly established or in deep trouble. The middle ground cannot last.
I think what we mainly lack is people asking questions, not a particular set up of tech.
😂 are you trying to goad the Fediverse into making an answer repository?
Surely a better approach would be you trying to build (and lead) a team rather than this weird immature approach? 🤷🏾♂️
yea … it’s just a chat about the fediverse, come on. I, like many here AFAICT on the fediverse, are here out of interest in the ecosystem/idea, and so are happy to talk about it.
I fully support discussion and actually encourage it, but, and this is just personal preference, it must be done in an honest and open way.
For the record, a recent discussion about this can be found here https://lemmy.ml/post/15471632
I’m aware of the previous post, I’d commented in the discussion already.
Otherwise, sorry to say, but I really am not sure what you’re talking about here. What sort of purpose could dishonesty here possibly serve other than plain trolling or drama milling (both of which seem unlikely on the face on my post)?
If you’re serious about “goading”, apart from planting ideas and expressing demand, I don’t think any other post like this could possibly influence devs into doing something serious like this.
Can you make your case why that would be a problem?
Some, maybe many, hope for the decentralised model of the fediverse to “take back the internet”. Each time a commercial platform “enshitifies“, there are then calls for the fediverse to replace it with a federated alternative, in part to take advantage of the moment of user agitation.
But, IMO, resources and financial support are a touchy topic in the fediverse. If such has lead to a mismatch between ambition and opportunity, and, capability, that may be worth addressing.
I’d opt into targeted ads for a federated S-O service, personally. The site is a huge database and needs safe-keeping, and that’s not free or even cheap. Tastefully placed ads that don’t pop over or ruin the printed copy I’d totally go for.
IDK if we’re really missing any software features, but I feel like it’s a good opportunity for a Lemmy plugin
Good lord please no.
Yep.
I think some sort of flair like feature for marking posts as questions and marking accepted or best answers as such are missing. Flairs are desire anyway. Tags perhaps as well.
Then, if there are to be “super votes”, such as the OP accepting an answer or even a moderator highlighting an answer, that would be new too.
If the UI can communicate with a plug-in, I’d imagine that could all be plugin side.
what is the situation ATM for plugins affecting the UI in custom ways?
But yea, this seems like maybe a perfect test case for the plug-in system.
Funny fact I just was thinking about asking if we could have good alternative for Stackoverflow that supports federation.
Forget federated stackoverflow, give me federated Gardening.StackExchange!
