I was curious what the Linux people think about Microsoft and any bad practices that most people should know about already?

  • Sonotsugipaa
    link
    fedilink
    English
    881 year ago

    Microsoft is definitely the corpoest of them all.

    Probably not the worst corpo, likely even, but out of the corpos, they are the most corpo corpo of any corpo.

    1. They own LinkedIn, and I could just stop this list here.
    2. They’re the founding fathers of Embrace, Extend and Extinguish.
    3. They are the vanguard of videogame studio consolidation, after buying Activision and Bethesda.
    4. AI
    5. Everything they do is soggy bread: you can eat it, it’s probably mostly healthy, I think, but if a product is not the minimum viable product then it will be; take the Halo franchise as a reference for blandness, Windows for end user tolerance - both are controversial yet functional and popular software that people complain (and do nothing) about. Halo took quite a hit in popularity, but still…
    6. Remember when a software company got in trouble for monopolistic practices? That was a thing that happened at some point, and it was Microsoft. Not that it will ever happen again, nowadays all the cool kids have some slice of the tech landscape on a chokehold.
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      Ok but look on the bright side of things! you get great futures with this big tech concentration and control of the market. For instance, who else doesn’t want a operating system hotkey to Linkedin, baked into their settings? How did I use a computer without that before?!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        Apple is highly restrictive on their OS and over priced. They are extremely pro consumerism with heavy marketing and engineered obsolescence to ensure you are always pressured to buy their new tech, and they are historically very strongly anti-right-to-repair.

        Microsoft is bad. But at least they are primarily a software monopoly.

      • Sonotsugipaa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not sure, at least the unrepairable mess made by Microsoft is software rather than hardware - you can reinstall a janky OS but you can’t unexplode a phone that disassembled itself when you sneezed in its general direction.

        There’s no fine line between the two companies.

        Edit: they continuously fucked up Halo in unexcusable ways, fuck them, they’re worse than Apple. Forgot about that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Yes. Microsoft is the king of “good enough” software. DOS was good enough (and had a free C compiler!). Windows gets the job done 95% of the time when it’s not freezing up or needing rebooting. Office is okay - and nothing else is 100% compatible so you get a bonus of vendor lock-in. New features are few and far between, as are bug fixes for non-critical issues.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    541 year ago

    Do you like having bullshit forced on you? Paying a $150 license to have ads in your operating system? Don’t care at all about privacy? Then Windows is for you!

  • macniel
    link
    fedilink
    431 year ago

    pretty much.

    If you need a point for developers: all public code repositories hosted on GitHub are harvested, at least in 2021, and used to train copilot regardless of their license. Furthermore, GitHub is OWNED by Microsoft now.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    my favorite bit was how no one at microsoft actually understood their own licensing pricing. for decades, you could call microsoft for pricing and get different answer from people in cubicles next to each other or even from your own rep.

    it was as if they were making it up as needed.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    Microsoft has been building the O365 platform to lock out competitors and locking users into an ecosystem that is difficult to leave. They systematically eliminate competition and have pushed to create laws that make competition harder. In embrace extend extinguish, they are in phase 3, which is a massive red flag. They also started putting out spyware and malware into their software and have proven they can’t maintain security; making them a bad actor in a position of power. Scale is debatable, but Microsoft is undeniably evil in 2024.

    • GrappleHat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      A coworker recently sent me a Word document with edits and comments they had added. When I downloaded & opened it (in Word on Windows!) it told me that it had the edits/comments but it wouldn’t let me see them unless I log in to my Microsoft account and then view it online in the web version of Word. What the actual fuck?

      Fuck that. I responded to my coworker and asked them to just send me the edits via email in plain text. I’m not winning popularity contests at work, but what the fuck Microsoft?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      Average Reddit comment.

      • Attempts to roast everyone in the thread and dreail the thread itself by attempting to be “funny”.
      • Contributes nothing to the discussion.
      • Is the reason why circle jerk threads begin at all.

      You: 🤡

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      What is the point of your comment? The person asked what the Linux community thinks about Microsoft and you come with this idiotic CiRcLeJerk bs? You didn’t add anything to the thread.

      I’ve learnt a bunch of horrible practices done by MS that I wasn’t aware of so thank you everybody else.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        81 year ago

        If you have been on lemmy for any amount of time, “Microsoft bad” is posted almost daily. I’m not disagreeing, yes they are bad. It’s super circle jerky to post a whole thread literally asking something that is posted in comments/other posts literally daily. It’s fine I just find it funny lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Microsoft abuses their de facto monopoly to engage in gross invasion of their users’ privacy, and continues to try to wrest their users’ control of their system from them by altering system settings after updates, and making some settings nearly impossible to change. And that’s to say nothing of MS’s attempts to turn their operating system into and advertising platform.

    • Balder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      In case people didn’t know what company he was referring to. /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    Maybe I’m going crazy but I feel like I’ve been seeing this post or an identical one for many days, maybe even a week, yet the age is still one day.

    Still, fuck MS and all.

  • Captain Beyond
    link
    fedilink
    211 year ago

    Microsoft is about as bad as any other proprietary software company. They do some good things for the open source economy, but they also mistreat their users.

    I think it’s a mistake to look at the free software movement as being a reaction against Microsoft or Google. It’s against the proprietary software world in general.

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 year ago

    First they tried to destroy FOSS, then they realized that they can make money and gain control using open source software, so now they pretend to support it. Microsoft is a monopolistic piece of garbage that I’m staying away from at all costs.

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they’re pretending. Open source software is a valuable resource for basically all major tech companies, and a lot of it is driven by major tech companies. Some kind of combination of open source and proprietary software will always be a thing for them. This isn’t some major contradiction, they use either model based on the specific needs of the project.

      This is why some think “Open Source” is too permissive since they see it as free/cheap labor to be exploited by huge corporations.

      I’m not sure that I see it that way, but I can see their point.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        61 year ago

        If as soon as it’s more profitable for it to not be they stop supporting it, then yes they were pretending.

        • Bilb!
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s not as if they are holding themselves up as supporting Free Software philosophies (as opposed to Open Source), so where’s the pretense?

          If somehow it ever makes strategic sense for them to stop making use of the open source model, yeah, they’ll stop. That doesn’t mean they were pretending.