• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1491 year ago

    “But Chrome is slightly more convenient! Why would I suffer tiny inconvenience today in order to save me from way greater inconvenience later? Who am I? Some reasonable person?” - typical Chrome user.

    • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      As a former chrome user it’s so real. Chrome connects every device for you and once you ARE in the loop it’s hard to leave it. Wanna switch to Firefox? Oops suddenly your authentication doesn’t work anymore. Oh what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

      It took me huge effort to switch off chromium based browsers because the longer you use chrome, the more it worms it’s way into all your services making it harder and harder to switch. I still can’t figure out how to seperate my Yahoo account from my Gmail account

      A huge reason I left is realising that if google decided I broke their TOS on something like say, YouTube ad blocking, they can just terminate by Google account and every service attached to it suddenly becomes unusable. I’d rather not be taken hostage like that

      Edit: for all the wise people in the comments. I was trying to decouple entirely from Google products, not just chrome

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 year ago

        What you’re describing sounds more like over-reliance on Google services than the browser. I don’t use gmail or google logins anywhere, I just have Bitwarder plugin to manage my authentication and use masked emails to create accounts. I did the same in all the different browsers I used over the years and never had any issues with it or with switching between browsers.

        • deweydecibel
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          You’re right, but that’s still a valid concern. Many people are much more ingrained in the Google ecosystem, especially through Android.

          We’re seeing this issue with Microsoft in the buisness space, too.

          And if course we’ve been seeing it with Apple for decades.

          These massive corporations have a great deal of people so ingrained in their interconnected services, it’s next to impossible to convince them to extract themselves.

          This is why the EU regulations focus on “gatekeepers”. Because users will not make the necessary changes in their habits to combat the abhorrent practices in the industry. There is no true free market here. So the solution is to regulate the shit out of these gatekeepers to make them open up and play fair.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            IMHO unfortunately most people will always go for what’s more convenient, don’t care about their privacy and don’t mind ads and there’s not much we can do about it. Eventually all the content on the web will be locked up behind a paywall and/or accompanied by nu-blockable ads. Most users won’t mind that. We’ll be left with what we can host/support ourselves like lemmy or mastodon.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        351 year ago

        Firefox syncs across devices as well, if you sign up for a Firefox account and enable sync. This works for bookmarks, logins, history, and you can even access remote tabs if you want. It’s also easy to send a single page from one device to another.

        On desktop, Firefox has an import feature that will pull your bookmarks and logins m other browsers (like Chrome) into your Firefox profile.

        Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

        • Cosmic Cleric
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Even if you’re neck-deep in Google services, Chrome doesn’t do anything special.

          Actually, being able to cast to other devices is very easy to do with Chrome, but extremely hard to impossible to do with Firefox, unfortunately.

        • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeee I’m using Firefox. It’s just difficult to desynch the Google services with all my accounts tied to it I had to one by one change em or even make new accounts entirely.

          The worst is the fucking Google authentication app and how it’s tied into stuff like Discord…At least I’m out of the Google ouroboros now but it was still intensely painful.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            I don’t understand the problem. Google services work in Firefox pretty much the same way, yeah? Does Chrome integrate an authenticator app? If som you might want change your 2FA settings at https://myaccount.google.com/security . If you have an Android phone you can get push notifications on it, or you can also use third-party authenticator apps.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 year ago

                Oh, gotcha. I misunderstood and thought you were describing a Chrome-vs-Firefox difference specifically. Yeah, I can relate. I’m de-googling my life but I’m not sure I’ll ever be 100% de-googled. I’m taking it bit by bit. I sign up for new things with different email addresses now and occasionally I’ll change existing services if it’s possible. But there’s no way I’m going to go through my bajillion web site accounts and move them all.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            the fucking Google authentication app and how it’s tied into stuff like Discord

            The one that implements the open standard TOTP that has a bunch of open source implementations?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Now I’m really happy that all the way back in the late 90s I learned as a software professional that depending on a 3rd party for anything essential is highly likely to eventually come around and bit you.

              So when the whole Single Sign-On (via Google, Facebook and so on) bollocks started becoming fashionable over a decade ago I just saw it as a single-point-of-failure dependency on a provider and avoided it.

              Ditto with Gmail - I’ve been renting my own domain with e-mail service included for almost two decades exactly because my ultimate dependency on that service is a national DNS Registar (not even the provider as I can just move over my domain and e-mail archive to another one) which can’t just turn around and screw customers because they’re the very same one on which massive companies depend for the proper working of everything linked to the domain names (thinks banks depending on them for customers reaching their website and e-mailing them).

              I highly recommend the practice on thinking “how critical is this for me” and “what would happen if these people went bankrupt or changed their minds” when you’re considering getting into a situation were there is a continuous dependency on some external 3rd party provider (this is also why Software As A Service can be a really bad idea versus just buying the bloody software if you’re using it regularly and data that you might need for years is stuck in their system with no chance of exporting it).

              Absolutelly: need to use something once or twice, it’s fine, but for everyday life or as a requirement for your business operations, depending on an external actor from which you can’t easilly switch and who doesn’t have some kind of iron-clad tight legal contract with you that includes stiff monetary penalties for non compliance (and, even then, they might just go bankrupt) is a pretty risky choice.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        what about those useful Google logins tied to everything now? Good luck with that.

        What? You can still use your Google account without Chrome…

        Unless you’re not talking about OAuth. Is it Chrome’s password manager? Because I’m pretty sure that’s easily exportable…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        For me it was as easy as download > export bookmarks and passwords. Nothing broke. I even still use my google account to login to some services. It just brings up the google popup and I’m in.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Chrome connects every device for you

        What? Besides debugging things on mobile devices, I’ve never sought to connect any device to chrome. Btw this exact same process works in FF too. You’re talking about chrome like it’s an operating system.

      • Joelk111
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        I didn’t have this experience at all. I switch browsers all the time just so I can know how they are, it’s painless every time. I’ve used non-chromium edge, chromium Edge, Brave, Chrome, Firefox, OperaGX, and probably something else. Chrome is probably my least favorite, as it just doesn’t have any bells and whistles.

        • 🐑🇸 🇭 🇪 🇪 🇵 🇱 🇪🐑
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Oh I was way deeper than just browser

          I unfortunately had an account, my entire phone linked to it, my Microsoft account linked to it and even my authenticator app linked to it which was responsible for 2FA on most of my non Google accounts.

          It was all interlinked in a way that made removing it from the root hard

          • Joelk111
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 year ago

            I can’t say I relate to that at all. I’m not sure what you mean by having your MS account linked to chrome, and stuff like my authenticator is on my phone, I didn’t even know you could use chrome as an authenticator.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      381 year ago

      We can’t forget that a lot of people have absolutely no idea that this is happening or what it means. Many folks just think the Chrome icon is how you access the internet and have no idea that there are other options. Helping to educate those folks is going to be a significant part of minimizing Chrome’s dominance.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’ve been removing Google services from my life bit by bit over the past year, and I have to say it is crazy how hard it actually is! They have inserted themselves into so many digital workflows, securing monopoly positions and preventing the rise of competitors and open ecosystems. In many areas the only alternatives are other tech giants, or accepting feature downgrades and having to set things up manually.

    I’m really glad that the browser is one area where the transition is actually very simple and straightforward!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    901 year ago

    Yeah, I’ll never use Chrome again. Google has always been shady, but this latest round of anti-features is unbelievable. I’m shocked there’s been no anti-trust suits related to what they’re doing with Chrome. Firefox is just a better browser with way more security options and extension support. That alone is enough for me to stick with it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    60
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well of course. Now all your traffic goes through proxies to Google’s servers for analytics.

    100℅ data harvesting.

    Genius move by Google. Even calls it a security/privacy measure!

    They will succeed too. Most of the human race are Neanderthals anyway. Couldn’t care less.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    471 year ago

    If Firefox goes away, I’ll use Epiphany or Konquerer before I subject myself to anything that makes me view ads.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      FF has way too much groundwork laid and way too much mindshare currently (especially given the rust language and all…) If, for some reason, thousands of devs just gave up on mozilla, more would continue the path and fork it most likely.

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        271 year ago

        Mozilla is the result of people giving up on Netscape. It will live!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 year ago

    I’ve used Firefox for years. It’s always been the underdog imo.

    If it ever becomes the top dog, I’ll switch! To the next privacy underdog. More competition is good.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    391 year ago

    My main problem is that I prefer other frontends to Firefox. I mostly use Vivaldi and think it’s great, but of course it’s Chromium based. I read somewhere that it’s just way easier to base a browser on Chrome than it is to base one on Firefox. It would be great if the frontend and backend were separated with a unified API and you could simply choose a frontend/interface (Vivaldi) with whatever backend/engine (Gecko). That’s not how it (currently) works though.

    There are Firefox forks, but they’re just that: forks with slight modifications. Vivaldi and Arc are basically completely different browsers. Even Orion isn’t based on Gecko, it’s based on WebKit.

    Add to that small compatibility issues with certain websites/web apps that aren’t Firefox’ fault, but rather developers targeting Chrome instead of “100 % web standards”. Still, as a user you’ll likely into (small) issues from time to time.

    People saying “just use Firefox” have a very narrow view on how any of this works and I sometimes feel like it’s some form of elitism where the cool kids use Firefox and everybody using anything else are “lesser people”. In reality, people have different requirements and priorities. It’s similar to people posting “just use Linux” under every article talking about problems with Windows.

    Yes, Chrome and Google sucks, I agree, but there isn’t a single universal solution to this problem.

    • deweydecibel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      People saying “just use Firefox” have a very narrow view on how any of this works

      No, not at all. I understand perfectly. Your concerns are valid.

      Our point is not supporting Chrome is more important in the long run.

      There is no front end in the world that will make up for the loss of true ad blocking and everything else Google pushes down the line.

      Let’s be clear about this:

      I don’t want to tell you to use Firefox. I want to tell you to use whatever you like. I wish we lived in a world where the choice didn’t matter.

      But we don’t

      When I’m telling people to use firefox, I’m telling them if you have a problem with the direction the internet is going in, you actually have to do something about it beyond just complaining. Support the competition, the only non-profit in the space, and the only true alternative browser left. Because everything is going to get exponentially worse without competition, and we really really need to preserve the one remaining safe refuge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Well, you’re not saying just use Firefox, you actually bring up valid points and reasoning. Just look at the top comment of this post stating “Not using Chrome is so easy” when it’s not.

        Let me clarify that I don’t hate Firefox, it’s my second most used browser on the desktop after Vivaldi, I just don’t think it’s a great browser with its current feature set. Mind you, as soon as ad blocking becomes infeasible with Chrome and forks I’ll instantly bite the bullet and fully switch to Firefox. But as it stands right now, Firefox is lacking features (some of them almost essential if you ask me, see my comment about passkeys) and compatibility (rarely Firefox’ fault, but rather a result of the Chrome semi-monopoly).

        The main problem is that Firefox is the only alternative to a Chromium browser on non-Apple platforms, but it’s not the solution to everyone’s problems. Let’s see if and when Orion is going to get ported to Windows/Linux.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      What features does Vivaldi have that don’t exist in a FF extension?

      And using a WebKit based browser is still better than using a chromium fork.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        I don’t know. I still prefer having vertical tabs, tab grouping, workspaces, web panels, proper loading information, full page screenshots and way more integrated in my browser instead of having to rely on possibly dozens of different extensions that in my testing never provided nearly as good of an experience.

        Implementation details matter.

        • Clay_pidgin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Also mouse gestures and tab tiling. Vivaldi has so many useful features baked in that I don’t want to give up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 year ago

            Vertical tabs: Sidebery. It might actually be better than the Vivaldi native. I havent used vivaldi with vertical tabs that much, its just a work/secondary browser for me.

            Gestures: Gesturify. This is just better than the vivaldi native one.

            Tab tiling: well you got me on this one. This is actually pretty neat.

            To be clear, I like vivaldi as well, it is my chromium of choice but with the above two extensions firefox is chefs kiss.

            • Clay_pidgin
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              I’ll take a look, thanks. I’m not thrilled with the idea of using a dozen extensions that could break or become incompatible, but I would prefer to get off of chrome!

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                For me it is only 5 extensions really which are essential. uBlock Origin, Dark reader, Sidebery & Gesturify & User agent switcher (it can come in handy every once in a while).

                P.S. There is a little caveat to vertical tabs which i forgot. You have to follow an easy 5 step guide on how to hide horizontal tabs when sidebery is active.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          31 year ago

          You can get vertical tabs on firefox with custom userChrome.css but it is a nightmare to setup and mozilla is only interested on breaking userChrome with every update lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            tell me about it! literally the ONE thing keeping me from FF at the moment. vertical tabs are too vital to my workflow at this point to sacrifice.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              tell me about it! literally the ONE thing keeping me from FF at the moment. vertical tabs are too vital to my workflow at this point to sacrifice.

              I don’t know exactly how to do it, I know you can because when I was in the firefoxcss subreddit there were many posts on how people came up with their own solutions for vertical tabs.

              I wanted vertical tabs to save on screenspace, for some reason the default firefox has the biggest top bar of all browsers and it is horrible, this is the userChrome.css that I use, it does what I wanted but it is not vertical tabs:

              https://imgur.com/h39dsHL.png

              https://pastebin.com/r54QRbKx

              It is also keyboard centric, I also had to install an extension because firefox (and this only happens on linux) uses alt+number to switch between tabs instead of control+number.

      • epchris
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        I could never get hardware accelerated video working with Firefox on my Linux laptop, and Google Meet (used for work) doesn’t work well ( but I guess I blame Google for that).

        • Final Remix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          Google meet sucks hard on every browser and piece of hardware I’ve thrown at it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Why is using WebKit-based browser “better” than Chromium-based one? Neither supports Google’s monopoly. Vivaldi is not just a skin for Google Chrome, it continues to support manifest v2 extensions and proper adblockers. And the company is owned by the workers, which is super cool

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Because they foster a web monoculture where the only thing that works are Chromium based browsers. For better or worse Google controls Chromium which means that they will continue to keep pushing it in the direction they want.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      It would be great if the frontend and backend were separated with a unified API and you could simply choose a frontend/interface (Vivaldi) with whatever backend/engine (Gecko). That’s not how it (currently) works though.

      Arc has floated this idea. Currently Arc is Chromium-based, but they say they’ve designed it to allow for swapping engines in the future.

      IIRC, Edge had a similar feature for a while, allowing you to run legacy Internet Explorer tabs if a site required it. Not sure if that still exists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      I tried really hard to use Floorp which fixes most of my problems with stock Firefox but even that just showed me how excellent Vivaldi is compared to other browsers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Let me add that support for passkeys is becoming more and more important and Firefox doesn’t support passkeys. Yes, it supports forms of WebAuthn (YubiKey and the likes), but not “scan this QR code with your smartphone and use biometric authentication to sign in”.

    • flicker
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 year ago

      You admit in the opening of your comment that your issue is preference and then go on to say there’s no single universal solution.

      There absolutely is a single universal solution. Either adapt your preference and use a different browser until you’re familiar enough with it to prefer it, or adapt your preference to admitting that you don’t care that Google is getting your data more than you care about being ever-so-slightly inconvenienced. It’s pretty simple.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Writing a new ff UI is pretty easy. The entire UI is written in html at this point. I’m not sure why people would say it’s “hard” to change.

      Embedding gecko into something requires work (even that isn’t that hard really, you just have to hand it a gl surface and pass through inputs)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    341 year ago

    Lots of people can’t just straight up ditch it. I have had multiple websites just don’t work with Firefox regardless of whatever add-ons I put. For me I just go into a Windows sandbox, but there’s people who are not that tech savvy and it’s often forced on them. Also iirc most schools have chrome books they let students use. So it’s basically forced onto people.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      371 year ago

      Do you have any examples? I have used Firefox for years and never experienced this, nor heard of anyone I know who uses Firefox experiencing this.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 year ago

        Not the commenter, but…

        I play tabletop RPGs (Pathfinder 2e for those care) online with some friends, and we use a website which hosts the program (forge-vtt.com).

        For the life of me, I cannot get it to behave on Firefox. Maps will be pitch black while on Chrome they render perfectly. I’ve tried every permutation of browser setting and extension toggling I can think of to no avail.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve hit the odd site where a menu doesn’t work the way it should, the payment form doesn’t work, overall form validation is wonky, or the captcha doesn’t work. I attribute most of these to slight nuances in javascript between browsers.

        I’m a (old, grey) dev, and I’ve had to shame colleagues into testing in mobile browsers other than Chrome and Safari.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 year ago

        Sonys website immediately comes to mind

        Trying to get my account back for my PS5 forced me to use edge for it to work at all

        And then to use edge on my wife’s PC because something I have installed REALLY pisses Sony off

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        Oftentimes, when I use Firefox (Main browser on my phone) things just don’t render/show up. One thing I noticed was when I input my area code to find a package distribution center, and it straight up didn’t show. Iirc it relied on Google maps for showing these places.

        It worked in Chrome. Not pointing any fingers, it’s just odd, is what I’m saying.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Today there was a page on my bank that just would not load in Firefox even though the rest of the site was fine. Switched to Chrome and it worked fine. I only use Chrome in these situations.

      • Billygoat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        I use Firefox except for one thing: web serial. Chrome is the only browser that supports it. Luckily you only need it the when setting up an ESP32 for the first time and can do updates wirelessly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      If a website or app doesn’t test in Firefox, I avoid it. That’s something I run into like once a year, and I just use edge once if I need to, and avoid that website or app in the future. It’s not hard to support Firefox, it’s just a shitty ass business decision not to

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Use a Chromium fork instead if you’re having so much trouble. Thorium is a decent alternative.

    • gian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      I have had multiple websites just don’t work with Firefox regardless of whatever add-ons I put.

      Have you tried to change the browser’s user agent ?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    Made the switch to Firefox last year. Love, love, love the freshness and versatility of the browser! Also add-ons for mobile!!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    I’ve read so many bs paid-off articles recently how chrome is so much better than firefox, or firefox has nothing left to give to its users