• no banana
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    They’re doing what they think they need to justify their existence, and although I personally believe being just a great browser would be enough I appreciate their communication around their ventures. It’s not great, but it’s not like they’re installing malware in the background.

    • lemmyvore
      link
      fedilink
      English
      241 year ago

      And may I point out that just being a great browser hasn’t worked out so well for Firefox so far. Unfortunately in today’s day and age you have to promote yourself to stand out. Chrome is an abject piece of crap that actively spies on you and yet Google’s PR has managed to convince the vast majority to use it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        It’s also worth noting that Chrome’s security model is much more robust than Firefox’s. Acting like Firefox is superior in every regard only serves to undercut Mozilla’s pleas for more contributors and funding.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      https://itsfoss.com/firefox-looking-glass-controversy/

      They get pretty close sometimes. I respect their mojo, but I don’t install vanilla Firefox anymore. On anything. For any reason. I don’t trust them anymore.

      I wish them the best, if I could donate directly to Firefox development I would, but it’s impossible with them. So I don’t. I donate to mullvad, I donate to the Tor project, and I donate to servo. That’s what I can do to make sure we maintain an open and free web

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s a great point. I totally thought they were non-profit. They’re just so on brand with my personal ethos I just assumed.

          But yeah checking they’re not. Totally wrong about that. Thanks for pointing it out