• just another devA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1911 months ago

      If you have an adblocker, and you’re not visiting any of those nazi sites directly, but do derail a comment section about a totally unrelated article? I say it is, yeah.

      Then again, I can be pretty petty about circlejerks.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        If I’m going to travel to a certain city I’m not going to stay in the hotel that’s hosting the Nazi convention. Here you are saying “yeesh it’s not like the convention will be inside your room!” But there are other hotels - simple as that.

        You act like a person needs some much better, really, really good reason not to read this article. If the site hosts Nazi content, that’s quite enough for me to just scroll to the next post. Why do any of us need to convince you or anyone else why this small act of conscience is valid?

        • just another devA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          311 months ago

          You definitely don’t have to. But if you were actually trying to, let me assure you that equating the reading of a harmless blog post to paying a hotel would not have done the trick.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            511 months ago

            Then you can’t understand analogies. Because you patronize a hotel by staying there, and you patronize a website by visiting it. The differences in their business models are immaterial to the comparison. But I can tell quite clearly you’re determined not to understand any of this so I’ll just stop there.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1211 months ago

      Viewing a website doesn’t mean supporting the website. Especially if you use an adblocker.