• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 months ago

    Won’t they start pulling more and more tax for it then ? Having it private keeps the competition at least, wouldn’t you agree ?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      60
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Your taxes already subsidize it. You just don’t see any benefits for your money in the current system because they pocket it without making upgrades.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      455 months ago

      ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        195 months ago

        Exactly. They’re getting massive handouts from our money. Let’s cut out the middlemen and pay a utility directly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      305 months ago

      What competition? Tax me and give me fucking municipal fiber instead of giving giant paychecks to wealthy assholes who invest nothing in improving the service but raise everyone’s rates regardless.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      245 months ago

      Ah yes competition. I get to choose between two providers, charter and at&t. Same price, about the same speeds.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 months ago

      Not where I live. All private Internet, but very limited choices that all keep getting more and more expensive.

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        fedilink
        English
        205 months ago

        They also tend to deliberately stay out of each other’s service areas so they can ramp up prices with de facto local monopolies.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      I guess to answer that, wonder if your water, electric, or waste companies are gouging you. If they are, like in Texas, then yeah maybe?

      Everywhere I lived, people and voting have strong control over utilities and they are fairly priced because it’s a service not a business

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      95 months ago

      Please tell us how “keeping it private” ensures competition and prevents monopolies. For extra credit, let us know WHO is responsible for preventing monopolies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        15 months ago

        Where did I say it prevents monopolies ?

        Where I’m from if it goes public I’m sure the govt is going to take advantage of it with piss poor speeds. When it’s private, at least there are companies competing with decent speeds even though it’s expensive. It’s a choice between the lesser of two evils.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          Where I’m from private is slower, more expensive, capped, and throttled. Public is faster, cheaper, unlimited and unregulated. And private lobby’s/bribes politicians to put laws in place preventing public.

    • Montagge
      link
      fedilink
      75 months ago

      Where I use to live was all private. CenturyLink was the only option as they had an agreement with Comcast that Comcast wouldn’t come into my area.

      I paid $60/month for 500kbps down. Yes kilobits.