@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agoUsers ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square227fedilinkarrow-up11.37K
arrow-up11.37Kexternal-linkUsers ditch Glassdoor, stunned by site adding real names without consentarstechnica.com@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year agomessage-square227fedilink
minus-squareAdmiral PatricklinkfedilinkEnglish38•1 year agoDidn’t Google+ do that? It’s been so long since that debacle I honestly don’t remember.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish71•1 year agoYouTube did it when Google bought them and changed everyone’s unique username to their Google account (real) name
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish6•1 year ago Looks like they prodded but didn’t unilaterally force.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish28•1 year agoWorse, StarCraft tried it lol. Major blizzard fuckup
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish10•1 year agoFacebook did it as well, maybe a couple years after opening up to the non university crowd. Neither FB at the time or G+ years later gave any thought that their no pseudonym policies put someone’s safety at risk.
minus-squareZagorathlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoGoogle+ was a Facebook-like social media. It was only ever supposed to be real names, so no issue.
Didn’t Google+ do that?
It’s been so long since that debacle I honestly don’t remember.
YouTube did it when Google bought them and changed everyone’s unique username to their Google account (real) name
wtf that’s a terrible decision lol
Looks like they prodded but didn’t unilaterally force.
Worse, StarCraft tried it lol. Major blizzard fuckup
Facebook did it as well, maybe a couple years after opening up to the non university crowd. Neither FB at the time or G+ years later gave any thought that their no pseudonym policies put someone’s safety at risk.
Google+ was a Facebook-like social media. It was only ever supposed to be real names, so no issue.