@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 years agoBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.beexternal-linkmessage-square114fedilinkarrow-up1910
arrow-up1910external-linkBlizzard locks you out of account if you don't agree to new terms; no ownership, forced arbitrationyoutu.be@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 3 years agomessage-square114fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish20•3 years agoWhich shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish2•3 years agoMeh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
minus-squareBezierlinkfedilinkEnglish19•edit-23 years agoBut also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?
Which shouldn’t be allowed in relation to consumer goods and services.
Meh, arbitration is cheaper and faster than actual litigation. I see clear advantages for both parties.
But also obvious disadvantages to the customer in cases like this. Why should the customer not have a right to refuse?