Authors using a new tool to search a list of 183,000 books used to train AI are furious to find their works on the list.

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s an interesting take, I didn’t know software could be inspired by other people’s works. And here I thought software just did exactly as it’s instructed to do. These are language models. They were given data to train those models. Did they pay for the data that they used to train for it, or did they scrub the internet and steal all these books along with everything everyone else has said?

    • FaceDeer
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      Well, now you know; software can be inspired by other people’s works. That’s what AIs are instructed to do during their training phase.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Does that mean software can also be afraid, or angry? What about happy software? Saying software can be inspired is like saying a rock can feel pain.

        • FaceDeer
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          Software can do a lot of things that rocks can’t do, that’s not a good analogy.

          Whether software can feel “pain” depends a lot on your definitions, but I think there are circumstances in which software can be said to feel pain. Simple worms can sense painful stimuli and react to it, a program can do the same thing.

          We’ve reached the point where the simplistic prejudices about artificial intelligence common in science fiction are no longer useful guidelines for talking about real artificial intelligence. Sci-fi writers have long assumed that AIs couldn’t create art and now it turns out it’s one of the things they’re actually rather good at.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Software cannot be “inspired”

        AIs in their training stages are simply just running extreme statistical analysis on the input material. They’re not “learning” they’re not “inspired” they’re not “understanding”

        The anthropomorphism of these models is a major problem. They are not human, they don’t learn like humans.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      They weren’t given data. They were shown data then the company spent tens of millions of dollars on cpu time to do statistical analysis of the data shown.

      • ThrowawayOnLemmy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        A computer being shown data is a computer being given data. I don’t understand your argument.