My Lemmy Box
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year ago

30% of Children Ages 5-7 Are on TikTok

www.honest-broker.com

external-link
message-square
233
fedilink
534
external-link

30% of Children Ages 5-7 Are on TikTok

www.honest-broker.com

@[email protected] to [email protected]English • 1 year ago
message-square
233
fedilink
And why did youth mental health problems accelerate after 2010?
  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37•1 year ago

    People love to repeat this, but US companies aren’t coming from a place of hostile intent like china’s special brand of tik tok for the states.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      38•
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not so sure about that, they seem pretty hostile to consumers and employees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36•1 year ago

      They’re both focused on profit. The only reason you see the other one as scary is because it’s owned by the scary scary Chinese. Red scare all over again.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        17•1 year ago

        No tiktok is not focused on profit. It literally has one of the worst/non existent monetization systems.

        • Dark Arc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yup, vine ripoff with some tweaks and the same monetization issue

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4•1 year ago

            Case in point. Vine literally can’t survive and so shouldn’t TikTok. Unless of course it’s getting propped up by a government with endless funds and not focused on profits.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1•1 year ago

              What’s the connection between Uber and China, then? I thought it was somewhat common for tech companies to be unprofitable for very long periods of time backed only by capital, but it may be China. Has anyone looked into this? Does Xi know what I like to order on weekends? Why haven’t we banned this yet

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1•1 year ago

                I wouldn’t consider Uber. This is closer to Vine vs TikTok. And we all know what happened to Vine.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1•1 year ago

              Why are you so convinced that an advertising platform that a 1/3rd of the country is glued to is unsustainable. And that’s ignoring the rest of the world, which is the majority of their user base.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1•1 year ago

                The same reason why twitter was NEVER profitable and it had more eyes glued to it. World presidents were using twitter for announcements. Never profitable.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9•1 year ago

        Why is Chinese tiktok different than that in the states then?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6•1 year ago

          Because the USA strong armed them into giving their platform handling to Oracle Corp, a top tier US govt contractor.

          But since pro-palestine cries can’t be silenced on TikTok as easily as Zio media, taking control of the platform is no longer enough

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3•1 year ago

            No, it’s literally a different app in China.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1•
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It’s the same thing, the international one was called TikTok and the US version is handled by Oracle

              It’s called douyin or something idk in China but it’s the same shit

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4•
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Maybe it says something that China limits access to their kids

                In 2019, Douyin limited users in teenager mode to 40 minutes per day, accessible only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. Then, in 2021, it made the use of teenager mode mandatory for users under 14.

                Seems like a bit of a digital smallpox blanket.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1•1 year ago

        You say “red scare” as if China isn’t a hostile nation state to the US. Go look at western company penetration in China if you want. Are you calling it “western scare” when China blocks yet another western company? I didn’t think so.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14•1 year ago

      So Facebook has the best interest of the people at heart?

      https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/11/facebooks-dangerous-experiment-teen-girls/620767/

      https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2021/10/05/heres-how-instagram-harms-young-women-according-to-research/?sh=50ff6082255a

      https://www.counterextremism.com/press/extremist-content-online-extreme-right-and-neo-nazi-content-located-tiktok-instagram-and

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4•1 year ago

        Facebook is not intentionally doing it. It was a byproduct of capitalism. While TikTok doesn’t care about profits and only wants to control our government and people.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11•1 year ago

          Most 10 years ago they were already manipulating people on purpose

          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jun/30/facebook-emotion-study-breached-ethical-guidelines-researchers-say

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4•1 year ago

            Yes, to maximize ad spend, not to take down a government for another government’s benefit.

            • Richard
              link
              fedilink
              English
              8•1 year ago

              You know though that the United States have “taken down” governments before? Americans do not have any right to feel superior on this issue in the slightest way

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1•1 year ago

                Does it matter what the US did or didn’t do? The US government should always put Americans first.

                Should we not ban TikTok because ourfounding fathers had slaves too?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              5•1 year ago

              To do both… But keep your head in the sand as long as you want

              https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/17/the-cambridge-analytica-scandal-changed-the-world-but-it-didnt-change-facebook

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1•1 year ago

                They literally sold the data for money. Not trying to topple a government.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3•1 year ago

                  So they sell data for money, to people who wanted to influence an election … But you see that as different?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1•1 year ago

                    Yes. Tell me what is more effective. Having a software that you own that you can segment and target directly or buy data from a 3rd party and then try and use that platform which is not designed to influence elections and is also monitored by the NSA.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8•1 year ago

      Hmm, here’s what Zuckerberg said when he launched Facebook:

      According to SAI sources, the following exchange is between a 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg and a friend shortly after Mark launched The Facebook in his dorm room:

      Zuck: Yeah so if you ever need info about anyone at Harvard

      Zuck: Just ask.

      Zuck: I have over 4,000 emails, pictures, addresses, SNS

      [Redacted Friend’s Name]: What? How’d you manage that one?

      Zuck: People just submitted it.

      Zuck: I don’t know why.

      Zuck: They “trust me”

      Zuck: Dumb fucks.

      Brutal.

      Could Mark have been completely joking? Sure. But the exchange does reveal that Facebook’s aggressive attitude toward privacy may have begun early on.

      They may not be trying to control elections (they certainly have their fingers in that pie too), but they’re still hostile to users.

    • just another devA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3•1 year ago

      Why would it matter whether or not it’s intentional, if the end effect is the same?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5•1 year ago

        It’s not the same. China wants to fuck up the American youth. That’s why their version of tiktok is so different from ours. But you already knew that I’m sure

        • just another devA
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5•1 year ago

          Nah, I don’t use tiktok, Chinese or otherwise so I wouldn’t know the difference. But you’re missing the point.

          • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
          • Chinese organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.

          And yet, you claim one is inheritly worse than the other or should be preferered. To me, they are equally bad. If anything, the USA manipulation is worse - they can use that knowledge more easily and to greater effect than an attacker on the other side of the world.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4•
            edit-2
            1 year ago
            • USA organisations abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
            • Chinese organisationsgenocidal dictatorship abuse social media to spy on and influence citizens.
          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3•
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Are the American companies doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

            Is the Chinese company doing it in pursuit of destabilizing the United States population for the betterment of the CCP and its interests?

        • GodlessCommie
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1•1 year ago

          China does not have a version of tiktok. You are repeating bullshit lies

          • Dark Arc
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3•1 year ago

            Douyin begs to differ.

[email protected]

[email protected]
Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • @[email protected]
  • 1 user / day
  • 1 user / week
  • 1 user / month
  • 25 users / 6 months
  • 0 subscribers
  • 8.98K Posts
  • 363K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • @[email protected]
  • enu
  • L4sBot
  • Technopagan
  • BE: 0.18.4
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org