• Otter
    link
    fedilink
    English
    421 month ago

    It could also be A/B testing, so not everyone will have the AI running in general

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Wouldn’t they be? They could measure how likely it is that someone clicks on the generated link/text

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate. More importantly, that text isn’t “clickable”, so they can’t be measuring raw engagement either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 month ago

            What this would measure is how long you would stay on the page without scrolling. Less scrolling means more time looking at ads.

            This is the influence of Prabhakar Raghavan.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Just because you click on it that doesn’t make it accurate.

            Given the choice between clicks/engagement and accuracy, is pretty clear Google’s for the former is what got us into this hell hole.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Yup, if you have to repeat your search 3 times, you’re seeing 3x the ads. If you control most of the market, where are your customers going to go? Most will just deal with it and search more.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        241 month ago

        Google runs passive A/B testing all the time.

        If you’re using a Google service there’s a 99% chance you’re part of some sort of internal test of changes.