• imecth
      link
      fedilink
      34 months ago

      These stats don’t include subcontractors and as such they’re very misleading. For example, who do you think produces the GPUs inside the steam deck? Hint: it’s not Valve.

        • imecth
          link
          fedilink
          24 months ago

          My point being that while valve itself has only 350 employees, it subcontracts far more than that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            that’s really silly to argument. only a few manufactures in the world even have the capabilities to produce GPUs and CPUs. even China doesn’t have the fabrication capabilities with current generation. So of course, Valve is going to purchase GPUs from a 3rd party unless you expect them to spend tens of billions of dollars to start their own silicon fabrication…but oh wait, now they have to purchase silicon, so they’ll start their own silicon mine… but now they need trucks…so they start their own truck manufacture…

            Do you expect them to become Samsung?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        A better argument is who works on Proton compatibility? It’s largely not Valve employees, yet that’s a unique stack to Valve.

        • imecth
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It annoys me too that Valve is getting most of the credit for Proton while most of the work is actually done in winehq, dxvk… I’m sure Valve pays for some development here and there, and greases some developer wheels, but the main thing they do is being a front end for consumers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            44 months ago

            I think you’re discounting just how much they’ve invested and continue to invest in Proton/WINE. But they don’t do lion’s share of the development in-house, they mostly just pay devs to work on it, and yes, manage the FE in Steam. They’re still a massive positive force for change in Windows game compatibility on Linux, and we’d be nowhere near where we are today without their investment.

            • imecth
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I think you’re discounting just how much they’ve invested and continue to invest in Proton/WINE

              I’m not really sure I am… Do we have some actual numbers into how much money they’ve sunk in linux?
              Gaming on linux is a huge community effort, whether it’s wine, dxvk, vkd3d, mesa, linux itself… and plenty of smaller projects like lutris, bottles, UMU… And all this spans literal decades, far before valve ever got involved.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                34 months ago

                AFAIK no, and we probably never will. But we do have glimpses into it, such as this article saying Valve directly paid >100 devs to work on Linux compat:

                Griffais says the company is also directly paying more than 100 open-source developers to work on the Proton compatibility layer, the Mesa graphics driver, and Vulkan, among other tasks like Steam for Linux and Chromebooks.

                I would imagine they still pay outside, open source devs to work on those initiatives, though maybe not as many since they’ve gotten past the initial push.

                • imecth
                  link
                  fedilink
                  34 months ago

                  AFAIK no, and we probably never will

                  They just might, open source financing is good PR. 100 is a fair bit more than i thought, thanks for the source.