Quick Introduction We have all been on forums, chats, reddit, discord, youtube, or somewhere and heard “Oh! Model XYZ is AMAZEBALLZ!zomgwtfbbq” then downloaded it (or more likely, some quantized form of it) and said “eww… This sucks!” This post is going to be a rather technical series of experiments to demonstrate the impact of implementation-specific hazards with inference. I will be using the term “reference implementation” to describe the lab that published and offers first-party hosting of ...
I 100% say as a sentient human being that no llm I have used has any sentience. It can’t even understand its own output.
You can say it, but that’s not a proof
so. this is definately something phenomenological. not all knowledge is based on proofs but all proofs are based on postulates deep down.
Correct, but phenomenology can be more precise than one opinion