Google might start charging for access to search results that use generative artificial intelligence tools. That’s according to a new Financial Times report citing “three people with knowledge of [Google’s] plans.”

Charging for any part of the search engine at the core of its business would be a first for Google, which has funded its search product solely with ads since 2000. But it’s far from the first time Google would charge for AI enhancements in general; the “AI Premium” tier of a Google One subscription costs $10 more per month than a standard “Premium” plan, for instance, while “Gemini Business” adds $20 a month to a standard Google Workspace subscription.

While those paid products offer access to Google’s high-end “Gemini Advanced” AI model, Google also offers free access to its less performant, plain “Gemini” model without any kind of paid subscription.

  • Ada
    link
    fedilink
    English
    841 year ago

    Oh no, if I don’t give them money, I won’t get LLM enshitification? The horror!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    491 year ago

    Paying for the privilege of using AI to sift through the vast bleak sea of AI generated garbage. What a time to be alive!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 year ago

    Good news, in my opinion. I don’t think users see the value in of AI and so maybe sites will go back to catering to organic results instead.

    Just kidding Google will just make the non-AI search experience so bad that people are forced to sign up for their AI subscription

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      181 year ago

      It’s already bad, they don’t have to do anything to make it bad. The real issue will be if they try to make it so it’s AI or nothing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      My first thought was “thank God! Maybe I won’t have to scroll past their AI results to get to actual search results”.

      Kagi needs better android integration. I hate searching ony phone now because I can’t use kagi easily.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    221 year ago

    This means we won’t be getting the results we already get.

    Or we are going to get the results we got when google was good, but with money.

    “We ruin results until payments improve.”

    • magic_lobster_party
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      Hopefully this will backfire and just push people to use alternative search engines. Unlike YouTube and other subscription services, Google Search doesn’t have any exclusive rights to content.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        It will. 5, maybe 8 years ago, google mighta gotten this one over on us, but it’s way too late. I don’t even trust google search results anymore, haven’t used it to look up something in over a year. Maps, sure. Web search? Nahp.

  • Harry
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    “Pay for this thing you never wanted or you won’t get it!!!”

    Oh no! Anyway.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    I’m all for this!

    It’s what basically every other AI tool wants to do, because building and operating LLM’s at this scale is horrifically expensive.

    So let them do it. Those that want these tools will pay, and the 99.999% of people that don’t give a fuck about AI can just continue as normal.

    Hell, if Google want to deshitify their search by removing the ML nonsense they’ve been loading into it for the last decade or so, even better! Let me pay for that too, and I’ll pay them exactly nothing.

  • HobbitFoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    91 year ago

    Probably because they haven’t figured out a way to tie Ad-sense to an AI engine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 year ago

    Imagine me paying to give my data to feed their info beast. No thanks. I can run my own AI tools.