3. Upgrade to more efficient heating methods, such as heat pump system instead of resistive heating.

Of course a company would say that they don’t want a monopoly publicly. If it’s known they are, or want a monopoly, then they are more likely to fall in public favor and get hit with fines and legal action, hurting shareholder profits.

You have a lot of faith that capitalism won’t do a capitalism when the opportunity presents itself.

Yes Europe has a lot better hold against the evils of capitalism, but it’s still capitalistic.

Nah. The C suite would love it if they were the only game in town. Shareholder profits and stock goes through the roof. They don’t have competition so they don’t have to innovate or improve anything but profits. They get a HUGE bump in net worth and “retire” while still collecting their board approved stock options.

Yes the company would eventually kill a ton of people and might be shut down like Boeing, but “I got mine, fuck you”.

Yup. No reason to rewrite the playbook.

“Full self driving” detects an imminent collision of it’s own doing. Car beeps and shuts off “full self driving”

Human was “in control” at the time of the crash, not our fault.

Not even.

Ford’s fix required them to physically add parts.

This is more like if Ford just wrote a software update to detect the crack and leak, then pop up a warning that you need to pull over and “secure” the fuel.

And the 8" were probably the cheapest.

So, as always in government, you get the minimum that satisfies the contract.

Depends what the definition of “best” is.

In capitalism “best” is the most profit for the least time and effort.

Let’s be honest here: they hate that the companies are jerking them around and using bullshit programs to cause even more problems, instead of employing people to solve the problems.

But a child process is already a child, not an unborn fetus. So they don’t care.

Definitely realistic, just not as profitable for rich billionaires.

Yeah, make them out of metal, that rolls on metal roads. And those metal tires can carry a ton more weight, so put a lot of people in them who are going the same way.

Oh right, we already have those.

Shittycon valley vs Shittycon slopes. Might as well be the same thing.

Yup. Though many people call it “Utah”

Still wrong, the beds are obviously empty. Only some people can enter this race, this is Todd racing.

Yes, exactly. State. Not the company that will profit more from you buying another house because their house is the only one allowed to have the cabinets and organization that you like. And have been using all your life.

You could claim safety concerns in anything and everything. Doesn’t mean that the manufacturer should have the right to intentionally make things that cannot be repaired due to drm.

In those counties that you cannot change a light switch on your own, do you have to call up the manufacturer of your home(and no other) and pay them to fix your light switch, and then have them say it’s better to just buy a whole new house, this one is not worth fixing.

And car chargers?!? Hell level 2 chargers are glorified extension cords. Why should they get an exception?

It is, especially when the choice that leads to that extra weight is less reliable, less efficient, and more costly. All things you don’t particularly want in a car

So let’s get back to the real discussion on how the packs actually work. Can you explain how a microcontroller is supposed to put cells in and out of the circuit?

Not sure where you’re getting “one total massive cell” from anything I wrote.

Every pack is made of a bunch of smaller batteries. You can’t get 400v without batteries in series, from batteries that only make ~3v.

Just saw your last paragraph edit. It’s a car pack, every ounce matters, and doubly so when it only adds complexity, reduces efficiency, and reduces reliability.

And an estimate of weight of the extra interconnect… let’s say it’s 8’ from back to front of the pack, a 350v pack and a 250kw motor. This means minimum of 715 A. Busbar that is rated for 700-800A @30c rise has cross section of 1/4"x2". For the 8’ length that means we have 48in^3 of copper. That is ~16lbs of copper alone. Not counting the contactors, insulation, etc.

Most packs have only 2 contactors. Not 2 per cell. The only way to have spare cells that are not in active use all the time is to physically disconnect the cells from the rest of the pack. The only way to do that is to have contactors at each “end” of the cell, or cell pack, that you want to switch in and out.

Car packs are ~360-800v nominal depending on the car/pack. To get to those voltages with the normal cells (~3.2-3.7v nominal)you need between 95 and 250 cells in series (wired one to another directly, all the power goes through all the cells).

Let’s do an example. The simplest pack possible. A 95s1p meaning 95 cells wired negative to positive in a single line. A contactor at each end to cut power to the car for safety.

This is the simplest pack. Also the lowest range and worst for cell wear.

So say you want to “double” the range? You “simply” build an entire separate pack, and drop it next to the first with it’s own set of contactors, right?

But in that case you have doubled the amount of interconnect bus in the pack(the wires to get the high current out of the battery), as well as contactors.

You could get to the same power storage (range and longevity) by making a 95s2p pack with one set of contactors.

So instead of 2 lines of cells, you connect each cell to it’s partner with a small piece of wire then connect that to the next cell in the pack.

This means you don’t need the extra long wire from the back to the front of the pack for the second set. The tradeoff is you can’t physically disconnect the second cells, but you don’t need the weight and complexity of extra contactors, and the long wire for second cell set.

So what’s the actual benefit of physically disconnecting the second set of cells?

When one battery dies in the 95s1p pack, the whole pack is useless, as all the power from the remaining 94 cells must travel through the one high resistance cell.

In a 95s2p pack each cell only has to take half the current of the entire pack (improving as you go up in parallel cell count).

You would be able to run one 95s1p dead, then switch to the other and keep driving till that is dead. But the efficiency of that is actually less than you get if you just had one 95s2p you ran from full till dead.

So again, being able to physically disconnect some cells in the pack only adds weight, complexity, and risk.

The Tesla car with “less range” that can be “unlocked” is literally just a software setting that limits the charge/discharge voltage of the entire pack, not switching in and out battery cells physically.

So… As you said

It’s okay to be wrong.