• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    113
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I’d think that once you’re at the level where you not only stick around in the dumpster fire, but also willingly give your money to this manchild, you lack the awareness needed to see how bad a blue checkmark looks on you anyway.

    EDIT: I have been informed that some get the blue checkmark against their will and without paying. Just when you thought xitter couldn’t get dumber…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      597 months ago

      Iirc just recently they started giving out blue ticks to people with lots of followers, regardless of if they wanted it. Then this week they make it so you can’t hide them. It seems like a dim move - piss off the people who bring lots of traffic to your website, but actively decided to not get a blue tick, by forcing the tick on them.
      If they didn’t leave beforehand, maybe this would make some people/orgs consider leaving?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        20
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        He’s been forcing blue checks on people since the initial change - with Stephen King, for instance. Basically a way to promote the program and make it look like prominent people are paying, but also a confused mix with the previous verification checks.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      97 months ago

      Only other twitter users see the blue checkmark. The people who think it’s dumb aren’t around.

    • just another devA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      FYI: Blue checkmarks were a thing LONG before paying for blue checkmarks was a thing. In the end, I think most people who are making an issue out of this aren’t even twitter users (let alone checkmark users) themselves.

      • BreakDecks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        417 months ago

        Nobody is unaware of that. It’s just that before Musk took over, the checkmark meant something completely different. What it means today is potentially embarrassing enough for people to want to hide it. Now they can’t.

        Before Musk the checkmark meant “This user’s identity has been verified and they are notable enough to need that verification”.

        Today it means “This user pays for Twitter”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          147 months ago

          Seriously, I don’t understand tgat person’s point. Before elon the check ment “yes this really is Billy West, voice actor for a lot of things”. It wasn’t a hard concept.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      247 months ago

      The online equivalent of a dunce cap.

  • CALIGVLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    37 months ago

    I don’t get it, what’s so bad about blue checkmarks? I know you can “buy” them now, but what of it?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      127 months ago

      Some beans were hiding it to avoid being scrutinized for paying into Elons platform.but still wanted to have their name, pretty much marketing and loosing money.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      57 months ago

      I think ppl with blue check shitting on elon and twitter were being called out for paying and supporting him.

      • dontwakethetrees (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        87 months ago

        People (rightfully) shitting on Elon were forcefully given blue checkmarks and now they can’t hide that mark so that it looks hypocritical.