Excellent. I also would have accepted the two Spiderman meme.
I thought about that too, but then decided to go with Bender because he’s a robot built by an ominous megacorp. Plus he has an attitude that pretty much sums it all up.
Boomers be like
“I worked hard for my inheritance and my summer minimum wage job paid for my house and college education”
Hahaha. They’re totally okay with stealing from people but hate it when others do the same to them. What a shame!
Reminds me of when Microsoft Bing was stealing Google data, and Microsoft was like “So what?”
Please don’t use this software to do things it’s capable of
Lmao.
I used the AI to TRAIN the AI!
Distilling has been around since forever. It’s a legitimate technique that can give you a better model depending on your needs.
OpenAI does it too to improve its models.
People use compilers to compile compilers, or just generally computers to design computer hardware, all the time. It’s not so strange.
I thought it was almost entirely the point to automate stuff. We have a great tool to automate the automation.
We have a great tool to automate the automation.
We have the idea of a great tool. Right now we’re kind of square wheeling our way through it.
I prefer the term bumblefucking, but ok, square-wheeling.
It’s AI’s all the way down!
—See you in City 01.
It’s like pupils learning from teachers, with the exception that there’s a single teacher in the whole world
Well, that’s not very open of OpenAI
Even the plagiarism machine gets plagiarized nowadays…
“Open”AI. This blocking manoeuvre kills progress.
I don’t know about that. Training your AI on someone else’s AI feels a lot like drinking someone else’s piss. I doubt you are going to extract much innovation out of that
Can’t be any worse then training it on uninspired social media comments.
This^
Preach
Username checks out
Sigh. unzips
U wot m8
Wonder what would happen if someone trained an AI on only uninspired social media comments
I also choose this man’s uninspired social media comments.
Then they shouldn’t interrupt their competitors commiting this mistake right?
It works pretty well. You can create a good dataset for a fraction of the effort and price it would have required to do it by hand. The quality is similar. You just have to review each prompt so you don’t train your model on bad data.
Not so nice when it happens to you I guess
It’s as if Sam is just talk and doesn’t care about the Open part at all.
Oh the irony. Just train it on copyrighted material without a license, like OpenAI did.
They put the “Ope” in Open.
They put the “N” in Open, which stands for Not Actually Open At All.
It stands for Open Platform for Everyone, NOT!
Boring af the A.I. Wars are.
It’s models all the way down. AI trained on AI trained on AI trained…
ClosedAI
One of their accounts, anyway…
